|European Interdisciplinary Society for clinical
and sports applications
Lochaeckerstrasse 18, CH-8302 Kloten, Switzerland. Phone: +41 44 803 06 30, Mail: [email protected]
|2002/ Crans Montana|
The 2002 State-of-the-Art Session was about the topic "Training and testing in open versus closed kinetic chain". The results of that session are published:
Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Training and testing in open versus closed kinetic chain. Position Paper of the European Interdisciplinary Society for Clinical and Sports Application (Yuanzh)
Scientific studies have indicated that no specific form of exercise and/or training has any particular advantage over the other. This applies to both assessment of efficiency, consideration of compression and shear forces, muscular activity and the extent of co-contractions. Unlike the broadly-applied non-specific and uncritical assessment of open and closed kinetic chain exercises, a specific application using the advantages of both procedures must be considered due to clinical, therapeutic and training-physiological aspects. Specificity refers to the training of either an isolated joint-muscle unit (arthron) or a system (group) of joints and muscles.
Considering the original definitions and past misinterpretations, it appears logical to emphasize the role of physiological mechanisms operating in each form of training and testing. Therefore, the use of the term: single-joint (SJ) or multi-joint (MJ) training, is recommended since this would best reflect the area of application, according to a recent consensus expressed by Yuanzh.
Consequently, SJ and MJ exercises should be applied both in isolation and in combination as indicated by the principles of specificity. On the other hand, continuous use of the terms open and closed kinetic chain exercises is confusing, erroneous, leads to polarizing discussions and should hence be relegated to the past.
These posters were published on the Congress2002 in Crans Montana. Every group of user (athletic coaches, medicine doctors, physiotherapists, scientists, manufactor companies) mentioned their statement from their point of view. You may also click on the links below to be directed to the Session Posters:
last update:11.04.2006 16:57